Recettear Wiki
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
 
::Please list specific complaints regarding [[Pricing Mechanics]]. [[Pin Bonus Percentages]] is incorrect or incomplete in many aspects - some of its contents is outright '''false'''. --[[User:CyberShadow|CyberShadow]] ([[User talk:CyberShadow|talk]]) 22:05, October 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
::Please list specific complaints regarding [[Pricing Mechanics]]. [[Pin Bonus Percentages]] is incorrect or incomplete in many aspects - some of its contents is outright '''false'''. --[[User:CyberShadow|CyberShadow]] ([[User talk:CyberShadow|talk]]) 22:05, October 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
:::An anecdote, but I saw the new page, was glad it was more accurate, then went back to the Pin Bonus Percentages page because it was much easier to get rough estimates of what to sell at. [[User:Jaesaces|Jaesaces]] ([[User talk:Jaesaces|talk]]) 06:59, September 12, 2014 (UTC)
 
:::An anecdote, but I saw the new page, was glad it was more accurate, then went back to the Pin Bonus Percentages page because it was much easier to get rough estimates of what to sell at. [[User:Jaesaces|Jaesaces]] ([[User talk:Jaesaces|talk]]) 06:59, September 12, 2014 (UTC)
  +
  +
:::Cybershadow is absolutely right.  Pin Bonuses Percentages is made completely useless by Pricing Mechanics, and is often not correct information to begin with.  I think the problem is some people don't want to understand "why" or "how" the things work, they just want the chart to tell them what to do and are scared away from Pricing Mechanics before they get down to there.  Maybe add a preface to Pricing Mechanics saying something like, "If you just want the chart, skip to the Strategy section."  In any case, everything that Pin Bonus has is inaccurate, and Pricing Mechanics has it in an acurate version, and also has information explaining the mechanics. [[User:OrbitalBliss|OrbitalBliss]] ([[User talk:OrbitalBliss|talk]]) 17:54, November 3, 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:54, 3 November 2014

Please use this page to discuss pages that have been labelled for deletion.

Pin Bonuses Percentage

Pin Bonuses Percentages has been added for deletion. The argument is that the new "Pricing mechanics" page is better. 

So far this is incorrect. Pin Bonuses remains more succinct and clearer. The pricing mechanics page would need to make a giant leap forward in usability and concision in order for it to be a viable substitute HolmesIV (talk) 04:08, October 3, 2013 (UTC)

Please list specific complaints regarding Pricing Mechanics. Pin Bonus Percentages is incorrect or incomplete in many aspects - some of its contents is outright false. --CyberShadow (talk) 22:05, October 14, 2013 (UTC)
An anecdote, but I saw the new page, was glad it was more accurate, then went back to the Pin Bonus Percentages page because it was much easier to get rough estimates of what to sell at. Jaesaces (talk) 06:59, September 12, 2014 (UTC)
Cybershadow is absolutely right.  Pin Bonuses Percentages is made completely useless by Pricing Mechanics, and is often not correct information to begin with.  I think the problem is some people don't want to understand "why" or "how" the things work, they just want the chart to tell them what to do and are scared away from Pricing Mechanics before they get down to there.  Maybe add a preface to Pricing Mechanics saying something like, "If you just want the chart, skip to the Strategy section."  In any case, everything that Pin Bonus has is inaccurate, and Pricing Mechanics has it in an acurate version, and also has information explaining the mechanics. OrbitalBliss (talk) 17:54, November 3, 2014 (UTC)